Staff working in a pub

No win No fee insurance claims

Following on from the supreme court judgment on business interruption we are seeing a large number of social media posts from publicans regarding no-win-no-fee services, basically, law firms who are setting out to help businesses claim on their insurance policies.

What this means is that these firms do not require any upfront payment while the case is in progress. However, there are risks and hidden costs that may be associated with this arrangement, and if you don’t have after the event insurance cover you could be liable for hidden costs and charges.

It’s important that you appreciate, before signing up with a no-win-no-fee service, that your claim is commercial, costs awards made in the courts, later on, can be very unfair and render some claims pointless to the claimant who took them out so proceed with extreme care, consider ATE insurance and do your due diligence. The no-win-no-fee industry has had many criticisms over the years, read the case studies and warnings published by the Legal Ombudsman – download your copy HERE.

1. Hidden Costs and Charges

These are things like court listing fees, printing and copying, investigations, expert reports, and so forth.

You will most likely have to pay these costs regardless of whether the case is won or lost.

2. Respondent Costs

Legal teams representing any Insurance company may request that their legal fees be covered by you – this is a commercial dispute, after all, nothing prevents them from making such requests and applications. Take note this is only likely to occur if the case goes to court and doesn’t end up with a settlement (see below).

It is important to be aware that this can be very costly, costs in the region of six figures are common in commercial cases.

3. Settlement 

Most cases that seek compensation never actually reach court and are generally settled by the parties.

Settlement poses risks in a no-fee no-win agreement. For example:

If you settle, your lawyer will charge their legal fees, but, recent changes in the law mean that lawyers can no longer deduct their fees from compensation.

The fees are now paid after compensation has been received and some firms are charging as much as 50% in the wake of the supreme court

If the case is not settled, you may be advised that continuing (with the case) is not a good idea as the chances of success in court are not good.

So whether the case is settled or if you choose not to go ahead with court proceedings, you will still be held liable for the additional costs mentioned above unless you have covered them with (say) after the event insurance (ATE).

…….

Consider this, such are the costs of ATE premiums on large insurance claims that if you can afford the ATE premium then you can probably afford to pay a flat rate to a law firm that is not operating a no-win-no-fee service! Perhaps even more ironic is that if you cannot understand the fine print of the no-win-no-fee contract you are thinking of signing you may need to take legal advice which will also cost! Take this as a warning if you do not take out ATE cover you are effectively self-insuring. The agreement clauses in the contract you are relying on may not be covering all of your costs, if you are not sure you should consider alternative legal service providers.

 

PAS is more than happy to put publicans in touch with a legal service with a proven track record that do not operate on a no-win-no-fee basis (we get nothing for doing this) see our blog HERE for more details on accessing business insurance claims advice.

Wholesale Beer Price Rise Update 2

Wholesale Beer Price Rise Update

Following on from the blog on 1st February HERE regarding brand owner price increases, it looks like Heineken (HUK) blinked and we missed it!!

But we had good cause because curiously not all traders have been informed in writing, one of the UK’s largest independent wholesale distributors we spoke to said they had not seen any letters from HUK to back up the news story.

What we can say is some (but not all) traders have been sent letters informing them of a price increase which is due to take effect from the 5th April.

It seems that as of yet NONE of the other major brand owners have followed suit.

The thing to note with the HUK increase is that the price increase is on draught products ONLY which seems to be penalising on-traders we believe unfairly.

Pubs and clubs have already borne the brunt of the falling sales during this pandemic while in the off-trade sector, including the major supermarket chains, are left untouched……

If this anti-competitive move on pricing between on and off-trade aggrieves you then take a moment to report the issue to the authorities HERE and for any tied publicans you can also report to the pub’s code regulator HERE

 

If you would like more details on the buying group and or a free strength of case review of your wholesale pricing then please click HERE.

 

This Blog was brought to you by GIFT.

Keep Checking in!  G.I.F.T. will keep you posted!

Wholesale Beer Price Rise Update

Brewery Price Increases…

 

1st February!! Usually, by this time of year, we’d have already seen the dreaded brewery price increase letter.

 

The silence this year, however, is deafening as brand owners wait to see who’s going to blink first.

There’s another theory of course….. There’s no point in increasing the price on keg and cask when nobody needs any – because they’re closed.

This creates a hugely positive opportunity for the brewers and crafters to show their hand now and declare a no increase policy in 2021.

Seems fair, reasonable, and infinitely sensible………. Don’t hold your breath!

 

If you would like more details on the buying group and or a free strength of case review of your wholesale pricing then please click HERE.

 

This Blog was brought to you by GIFT.

Keep Checking in!  G.I.F.T. will keep you posted!

 

 

Staff working in a pub

Business Interruption claims update

We have now applied the Supreme Court judgment to the business policies in the Pubs sector.

The FCA and Supreme Court have made it clear they are not going to be representing policyholders in helping them get redress or payouts, they consider Insurance firms will having seen the Court ruling, now start to “play fair”. As many publicans have reported there is an almost blanket refusal to payout, unfortunately, insurance companies have been ignoring people with legitimate claims for many years now, pushing them to “go legal or get nothing”, it is a strategy that can easily limit large liabilities and has a foothold in the industry. Given a large amount of money is at stake we consider that those with the best policies need to be fully advised and represented to maximize a payout. We do not recommend no-win no-fee law firms, they take 50% of any payout.

The ruling has meant some policies that were previously considered not to worth pursuing have now become “good” and therefore viable to pursue.

The following policies are considered good, viable, and worthy of recommending for legal representation in getting a payout. If your policy has the wording disease in premises it is worth pursuing, so if the policy you have is listed below with the +disease in premises next to it you will need to have a policy with that clause to be viable.

  • Accelerant +disease in premises
  • Aro +disease in premises
  • Axa (art)
  • Brit Insurance
  • Canopius SME, Beech underwriting (BUA) +disease in premises
  • Capital Markets Underwriting Leisure (CMUL)
  • China Taiping Golf Club
  • CMU/Tasker
  • CMU Leisure
  • Commercial Express/Axis  Public House
  • DOA
  • Eaton Gate Commercial Combined Policy/Broker Express
  • Eaton Gate nightclub, restaurants, pubs etc
  • Hiscox
  • HIUA Argenta Guest House
  • HIUA Public House, etc.
  • MG Underwriting Commercial Combined
  • New India
  • QIC (Europe)/HIUA/Aston Lark +disease in premises
  • QIC +disease in premises
  • RSA Restaurants and Hotels +disease in premises
  • RSA Combined Business +disease in premises
  • Touchstone/Allianz
  • Tristar Public House +disease in premises

Where can you get help with your Business Interruption claim?

For all those whose policies appear in the list above (and or if you have the disease clause) – if have not yet been in touch, please contact the insurance advice service HERE

Pubs Code rights during Covid – Jan 2021 Update

Pubs Code timings – Jan 2021.

An update from the Pubs Code Adjudicator’s office

Following the announcement about a national lockdown in England from 06 January 2021 and in addition to the national restrictions in Wales, the PCA has been contacted by the Pub-Owning Businesses (POBs) and been told their furlough arrangements mean that they either cannot (or may not be able to) comply with all of their Pubs Code duties in respect of serving compliant Rent Proposals, Rent Assessment Proposals (RAPs) and Market Rent Only (MRO) full responses during the new national restriction period.

In light of this, the PCA has agreed to restore the Declaration agreement initially for the period covered by the restrictions from 6 Jan 2021 until 31 March 2021 – this in effect suspends all timings under the code related to the service of rental offers and requests. Those tenants at Independent Assessment are not affected, the new declaration does not apply.

The full announcement on the lockdown can be read on the Pubs Code Adjudicators website here

If you need advice on the code contact us here

Further, the PCA has also published an open letter to all Tied Pub Tenants see our other blog HERE

Pubs Code Adjudicator – open letter

The office of the Pubs Code Adjudicator has published an open letter to tied pub tenants.

The letter from the regulators office covers several areas of key interest for tied tenants:

  • BDM conversations
  • Discretionary support
  • Rent Reviews and Trigger Events
  • Pub Company rent assessments – trading uncertainty
  • Insurance – right to cheaper policy
  • Protection of Pubs Code rights – see our other blog HERE

Download your copy of the Tied tenant open letter HERE

For tied tenants wanting to trigger MRO and go free of tie (because of issues causing a downturn in trade) click HERE

Beer Duty

Business Insurance – Supreme Court Judgement update

The long-awaited judgement for the appeal of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)’s test case on business interruption insurance will be handed down on Friday, January 15, 2021 at 9.45am via live video link.

The decision upheld by the Supreme Court will be the final say in the matter and is set to impact hundreds of policies, dozens of insurers, and hundreds of thousands of policyholders, and many billions in claims.

Link to the Supreme Court news pages are here

The hand-down(s) will be streamed on Supreme Court Live but will then be made available later on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service.

Grants for Pubs 2021

Grant Support to see Pubs through to Spring

Retail, hospitality, and leisure sectors are to receive a one-off grant worth up to £9,000, the Chancellor has announced today.

The new one-off grants come in addition to billions of existing business support, including grants worth up to £3,000 for closed businesses, and up to £2,100 per month for impacted businesses once they reopen. The government has also provided 100% business rates relief for retail, hospitality and leisure businesses, £1.1 billion existing discretionary funding for Local Authorities, the furlough scheme now extended to April and 100% government-backed loans, extended until March.

Details:

  • the one-off top-ups will be granted to closed businesses as follows:
  • £4,000 for businesses with a rateable value of £15,000 or under
  • £6,000 for businesses with a rateable value between £15,000 and £51,000
  • £9,000 for businesses with a rateable value of over £51,000

Full announcement here

Contact PAS here

Breaking Beer Ties and Covid

Beer Ties can be broken by using the pub’s code,

Tied pubs can have a market rent only agreement (MRO) and go free of tie, but tenants need to know their trigger opportunities to get an MRO offer.

Most triggers to going free of tie are unforced, that is to say, they occur contractually or with the passing of time e.g. at rent review, lease renewal, 5 years after concluding the last rent.

Other ways to trigger your right to a market rent are “forced”, that is to say, if you can find fault in previous rent offers you can have the offer remade or if the pub’s trading situation changes.

In a recent award published on the Pubs Code Adjudicator website, PAS represented an EI Group tenant whose previous rent assessment was riddled with faults and non-compliant. With our expert help, they got a new offer which re-triggered their MRO – see points 152 and 163 of the award. Download a copy here Quarter_3_2019_9_Statutory_Arbitration_Award_1_CLATWORTHY

Aside from finding faults in tied rent offers you may be able to use the downturn in trade to “force” trigger MRO too, see our service here

If you would like us to force an MRO trigger for your pub contact us here

A recent article by an award-winning journalist outlines the opportunity to force an MRO, as we said in the article there has never been a more “fertile” chance to break the tie, this moment is more about the long-term survival for many in the U.K. pub industry.

Read the full article from Jonny Garrett in Good Beer Hunting here